CRISPR Cas-9, Genome Editing, & Genetic Intervention

by: Jordan Muhsin

CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing is truly a remarkable process that can ensure the longevity of our species while eliminating disease and genetic mutations. However, there lies a much darker and more sinister aspect that is often overlooked with new technology, the weaponization by the elite and those who seek to transform society into their own depictions of utopia. An even more Luciferian primitive concept is the elimination of “weak genes” and “mentally disabled” from the human population. This idea derived from Satan himself, and has manifested in various dictatorships around the world. It is through the evolution of genomic editing that human beings are now faced with a new egregious threat: the revocation of our natural genome, in exchange for compliance with the vision from rulers of the new world order and the regulations of the global iatrarchy that seeks to obliterate the concept of medical sovereignty.

Institutions like the National Academy of Science advocate this practice, under the pretext to redefine conception as we know it and bring science into the modern age. The truth is, that far more problems exist under the presupposition that humans are themselves gods, which will be discussed in this report. Proponents like Chinese Scientist He Jiankui, went against Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regulation, successfully creating two twins born with modified genes making them immune to HIV virus^[1]. Some medical professionals such as Nathanial Comfort, have spoken out against this practice. Dr. Comfort believes that^[2] “a partnership between public and private industry, as well as the general public, is the best way to keep everyone accountable.” Beyond Social Darwinism lies a much more sinister plot, a global effort to suppress our natural form by introducing eugenics. As noted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Nathanial Comfort believes that in order “to help steer the science [of gene editing] in positive directions…we need to have conversations to avoid the back side of the double-edged sword…[d]ull the back end while sharpening the front.”

What is CRISPR/Cas9?

CRISPR is an acronym for “Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats,” and “Cas9” is an enzyme used to bind to the DNA where it “cuts it, shutting the targeted gene off,” as stated by the Broad Institute^[3], adding “Research also suggests that CRISPR-Cas9 can be used to target and modify “typos” in the three-billion-letter sequence of the human genome in an effort to treat genetic disease.” This nefarious wording gives the illusion that God creates mistakes, and that man can do a better and more efficient job in producing the “perfect genome.”

According to the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) National Library of Medicine (NLM), “CRISPR-Cas9 was adapted from a naturally occurring genome editing system that bacteria use as an immune defense.” How does CRISPR work? The process itself is described by the NIH NLM, [paraphrased] as a process using a synthetically created^[4] “guide RNA” which attaches to cells and cuts the cells DNA sequence, then use the cells’ own “DNA repair machinery to add or delete pieces of genetic material.” This can also replace an existing segment of DNA with an artificially customized DNA sequence, as a result making changes to the DNA. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) claims this technology allows those with “great interest in the prevention and treatment of human diseases” to produce new solutions. This “dual-edged sword” equally provides maleficent entities a direct opportunity for genome-editing technology to be inverted against the public on multiple fronts, creating even more problems than we began with. Nevertheless, this technology must progress, and we have to consider which regulations should be applied to prevent this technology from being utilized against the American population to force political compliance into an authoritarian utopia. According to Geneticist Ricki Lewis^[5], (2021) “In genome editing, the enzymes generate precise breaks across both strands of the DNA double helix that are aligned, not offset. Then natural DNA repair systems mend the breaks, removing or even replacing or adding DNA nucleotides to the targeted area” (p. 408).

Analysis:

The ability to participate in gene-editing experimentation has recently ‘sprung to life’, and now seeks to become ubiquitous within our society. A full-frontal assault has been unveiled, currently restricted on a mass scale only by the global moratorium on human genetic research. Yet this is only what is shown to the public. Scientists likely conduct covert experimental research using private funding to advance genomic manipulation, mRNA, and DNA-changing technology. There are many concerning aspects of human genetic manipulation including artificial wombs, unintended mutations, genome weaponization, evolutionary eugenics, human-animal hybrids, unregulated global government intervention, CRISPR/Cas9 bioterrorism, and the rise of A.I. biotechnology.

Artificial Wombs & Unintended Mutations.

India and China have already begun the creation of artificial wombs to synthetically grow children, using genome editing using novel contraptions like EctoLife^[6] or A.I. Nanny^[7]. This process would allow for manufactured “humans” to ensure their longevity as a species on this planet, regardless of our engagement in natural reproduction. This would also allow for the diversion of a traditional concept of family while allowing the continued increase of ecotoxicities and electromagnetic pollution which contribute to the weakening of our genome and the sterilization of human reproductive organs. This transition would subtly provide the means to allow a global social credit system to be implemented by new world leaders which, depending on narrative compliance, would allow couples to attain a child, or children, grown from an enterprise-controlled artificial womb. Those who harness and control the synthetic production of human life will ultimately gain property rights and entitlement for influence, to all humans genetically manipulated or “grown” under these circumstances, inevitably consisting of a large percentage of the future population. What unintended mutations can arise from the artificial manipulation of the human genome? The answer is beyond incomprehensible. As scientists begin to attempt to play gods, creating replicant lifeforms deemed “human” due to their origin and genetic composition. Despite the confidence of many genetic “experts,” humans still have little understanding of the totality of the human genome and the long-term implications which can arise through human manipulation and experimentation. Once these changes are introduced to the population, it will be impossible to turn back, and may result in health deficiencies for many unfortunate generations of unlucky recipients deriving from artificially engineered flawed genetic concoctions.

Genome Weaponization & Eugenics: Evolved.

While embryos can be manipulated to ensure a healthy baby is born without life-threatening genetic factors or mutational phenotypic alleles, the extent genomes should be manipulated remains a subjective one. Domestic limitations on genomic manipulation can be enacted through regulatory legislation, however the reality is that we cannot control the aspirations of other nations beyond our own. This means that scientists around the world will all have a different presupposition for their own usage of mRNA and longterm DNA manipulation. In the case of Chinese researcher, Dr. He Jiankui, the genetic make-up of IVF embryos was synthetically altered, then implanted into a woman’s uterus. As a result, healthy twins Lulu and Nana were born using CRISPR editing, allowing the twins to be born with resistance to HIV viral infection^[8]. The news appeared on Nov. 25, 2018, and quickly raised ethical concerns across the world and throughout the genetic community. In China, all novel innovations must originate within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This means He Jiankui was likely used by the Chinese government to bring this covert research into the public light, [theatrically] jailing He Jiankui for three years by CCP authorities^[9]. Despite his alleged defiance of CCP regulations, miraculously, in 2022, Dr. He was released from prison and continues to live in China to pursue genetic research^[10] (MIT). Through He Jiankui’s CCP allegiance and self-sacrifice, China now stands as the first nation to produce genetically engineered human beings. As He Jiankui displayed, once the “perfect human form” has been achieved through CRISPR genome editing and artificial conception, the next stage will be innovations. This means “enhancing” our genetic structure using experimental biotechnologies to produce desirable phenotypic attributes. These subjective traits will vary from person to person, however, will eternally expand far beyond what we can currently conceive, changing the future definition of humanity. Forced allegiance to the one party narrative has been seen in America with the suppression of free speech alone, the trials of a domestic social credit system, and these eugenics-derived experiments are likely to be reiterated in genome editing. While CRISPR allows the ability to make us immune to disease, what is the line on which scientists would cease the expansion of medical knowledge? The next stage is where scientists could begin to remove or control sensations such as pain and pleasure, only allowing their creations to feel emotion based on global government compliance. These signify only some of the perceivable horrors associated with eugenic and CRISPR genome-editing research.

The Age of Chimera: Animal-Human Hybrids.

The dawn of a new age has arrived. Under the guise of innovative scientific research and novel epigenetics, the hybridization of various genomes has begun. The message touted from the iatrarchy is simple: with genome hybridization, human organs can be grown, saving millions of lives. Currently, there are 105,800 men, women, and children on the national transplant waiting list, with an estimated death rate of seventeen victims per day^[11]. These statistics alone, are enough to pursue scientific endeavors which could allow organs to be grown in animals, later transplanted into humans. Although the goal is concentrating human cells to a specific area, allowing the formation of human organs, the problem, lies in the ability to control where the human cells begin to develop in the body. If too many human cells develop in the brain, a low-level state of human consciousness could be achieved, leading to frightening science-fiction-like mutations and other biological atrocities. Currently, there exists a moratorium on human-animal research. The practice of human organ development in animal hosts for surgical harvesting, known as xenotransplantation, has already begun, as boasted by global institutions like the World Economic Forum^[12]. FDA-approved Galsafe Pigs are rated to “be used for food or human therapeutics^[13].” This means soon we may reach a point where we find ourselves eating genetically altered human-grade medical therapeutics harvested from chimera human-animal hybrids, smearing the line between “carnivore” and “cannibal.”

Artificial Intelligence (A.I.).

Another aspect of CRISPR research is the infusion of artificial intelligence into our biological state. This means adjusting the human genome to become more adaptable to mechanical intervention. Implementing biological resilience through gene-editing, in order to form our bodies into hybrid computer systems, controlled by artificial intelligence. As devices like Neuralink and the Metaverse are unleashed upon the American public, we will soon find ourselves quickly seeking the convenience of revolutionary technology^[14],^[15]. With the inception of this technology comes the obsoletism of outdated entities, such as our natural genome, and even the human “battery” itself, replacing our consciousness with artificial operating systems. It is only a matter of time before we are swayed into the permanent adjustment of our species’ genome, to facilitate biological fusion with technology, also known as “the great merge”. While Elon Musk himself attempts to convince the human population that we are already modular cybernetic organisms, that cannot exist without external mobile technology or at the least, internet connectivity. Musk believes his Neuralink contraption, which requires removing a piece of the human skull, and inserting electrodes into the brain, will allow that biological transcendence with machinery and surveillance tech. Dr. Francis Collins, the founder of the discovery of the complete human genome, believes that by using Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), depression can be eliminated^[16]. This is the first step in the revocation of human emotions, and regulating emotions based on personal and public composure and allegiance to the anti-human system of control. In order to assist with the transition from man to machine, mass genome editing would inevitably need to take place to ensure we could survive the surgical procedures required to transform our bodies and minds into another form.

CRISPR/Cas9 Bioterrorism.

CRISPR/Cas9 genome manipulation is a new terrain for modern terrorists, as foreign operatives and nefarious actors can obtain positions gaining access to genetic information, with the intention of causing mass destruction to the surrounding population^[17]. This means that experimental bioweapons can be unleashed in heavily populated civilian areas, causing detrimental phenotypic mutations to the human genome and future generations. Under these circumstances, it is presumable that scientists would want to keep this technology classified and heavily regulated. Instead, the opposite is true and CRISPR genome editing instructions are widely available across the internet to anyone who so chooses to request them. Without CRISPR regulation, this technology can be dangerous in the hands of the wrong individuals, especially when those individuals are scientists and have the means to facilitate a biotechnological threat across the human race. False flag bioterrorism can also be factored into this scenario, should the government, or global iatrarchy choose to mandate another global vaccine, as seen in the CRISPR/CAS-9 synthetically manipulated SARS-CoV-2 ‘novel coronavirus,’ and the resulting mRNA toxic concoctions forced upon the public.

Unregulated World Government Intervention.

On July 26^th, 2019, Bureaucratic Oligarch World Health Organization Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus proclaimed^[18], “Human germline genome editing poses unique and unprecedented ethical and technical challenges,” adding “I have accepted the interim recommendations of WHO’s Expert Advisory Committee that regulatory authorities in all countries should not allow any further work in this area until its implications have been properly considered.” Just two years later, the depraved intentions of the global medical dictatorship were revealed as Dr. Tedros completely changed his position on genomic editing, calling for immediate rapid deployment of human genome editing^[19]. On July 21^st, 2021, WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced, “Human genome editing has the potential to advance our ability to treat and cure disease, but the full impact will only be realized if we deploy it for the benefit of all people, instead of fueling more health inequity between and within countries.” To encourage gene-editing efforts, the World Health Organization, released its own authoritative standard, the Official WHO Recommendations on Human Genome Editing^[20]. The consistently changing regulations touted by the global health bureaucracy create an expectation for the compliance of all nations to conform and adhere to subjective mutable worldwide advisory, no matter the currently unforeseen risks and long-term consequences.

God’s Intended Genome.

In Genesis, the Holy Spirit reveals our origin, and the intention of the continuation of our species. Genesis 1:27-29 (NKJV) “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. Then God blessed them, and God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.’” What was not stated here was to rule over each other, taking His place as gods, nor create man in our own image depending on our personal desires. As this directly defies God’s written intended preference for our creation, we cannot rely on Scripture to support CRISPR Cas-9 gene-editing and the artificial creation of human beings through genetic intervention.

Conclusion:

The individual sovereignty of those formed through natural conception, is given to us from our Supernatural Creator. If institutions and global entities begin the creation of lifeforms that are deemed “human,” due to their genetic composition, who will bear responsibility for the rights and sovereignty of these entities? As with all medical innovation, the ruling class will use a crisis to claim hegemony over the technology, inverting it upon its creators, and those who seek to benefit from these advances. Our only defense to maintaining dominion over our natural genetic composition as a species is our U.S. Constitution, legislation, gene-editing regulations, and personal resistance to act as a biological host for mass experimentation through individual genomic manipulation. The devastating reality of this critical situation is that our need for rapid revolutionary unregulated medical advancement outweighs the short-term potential implications. These initial dangers are already being exploited and may inevitably require a threat to the global population before regulations will be permanently applied to researchers, scientists, geneticists, major pharmaceutical companies and government agencies. As seen during the impacts of the coronavirus pandemic, government compliance superseded human rights, disregarding individual consent to mandated injection and demanding public access to biological health information. By this measure it is only a matter of time before other genetic threats emerge in modern society. While today’s scientists continue to harness the ability to transcend our genome with novel technology, we exist in the first generation to hold the power to both understand and prevent the long-term implications of negligent genetic manipulation. This generation must enact regulatory action to prevent visible phenotypic traits resulting from experimental genomic-editing. If these synthetic creatures are deemed a separate species to organically conceived children, what implications, further division, and civil rights violations could arise throughout American society? How will the presence of CRISPR creatures, a ‘novel’ species, fit into the Biblical Christian worldview?

– February 16th, 2023

^[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724388/

^[2] https://nihrecord.nih.gov/2022/01/07/jhus-comfort-discusses-ethics-gene-editing

^[3] https://www.broadinstitute.org/what-broad/areas-focus/project-spotlight/questions-and-answers-about-crispr

^[4] https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/understanding/genomicresearch/genomeediting/

^[5] Lewis, R. (2021.) Human Genetics: Concepts and Applications (13^th ed.). McGraw Hill LLC.

^[6] https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/artificial-womb-facility-30000-babies-a-year

^[7] https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3165325/chinese-scientists-create-ai-nanny-look-after-babies-artificial

^[8] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813942/

^[9] https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/12/30/131061/he-jiankui-sentenced-to-three-years-in-prison-for-crispr-babies/

^[10] https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/04/1048829/he-jiankui-prison-free-crispr-babies/

^[11] https://www.organdonor.gov/learn/organ-donation-statistics