On November 15th, 2021 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) vouched for major pharmaceutical companies Pfizer-BioNTech, requesting1 that a federal judge defer the total release of over 329,000 coronavirus concoction documents. As a result, 500 pages would be distributed per month, lasting until the year 2076.
On December 9th, 2021 a second announcement was made: more pages were to be included. Instead of 55 years, FDA stated now they would now need until the year 2096 to publicly release all the Pfizer documents. This tactic allows drug makers to stall distribution of potential evidence against their mandated vaccinations, soaking up every last dollar in the process.
After the decision that 55 years was not enough, the FDA determining that instead the companies would require 75 years to release all 329,000+ pages, plus the newly included documentation. This way, not a single human currently or responsible for the design, manufacturing, or the distribution, can be convicted of any involvement in the mandated global experiment. The mass data, which although can be used to inform and protect future generations, could not have been legally obtained without a deadly pandemic, due to the unknown risk that it presents to the American population. The variants perpetuate the state of fear, emphasized by the COVID-19 propaganda, and fear of lockdowns, or loss of basic rights. Should the opinions of few determine the behavior of all?
Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency
The Public Health and Medical Professional for Transparency’s (PHMPT) continues to fight back, demanding answers from the pharmaceutical manufacturers, allowing scientists, medical professionals, journalists, and citzens to properly analyze the totality of information. Their official website contains, Pfizer documents, Court documents1, and vast amounts of information against the medical state of control. A statement on the website reads2,
“This nonprofit, made up of public health professionals, medical professionals, scientists, and journalists exists solely to obtain and disseminate the data relied upon by the FDA to license COVID-19 vaccines. The organization takes no position on the data other than that it should be made publicly available to allow independent experts to conduct their own review and analyses. Any data received will be made public on this website.”
“Four days after the Pfizer vaccine was approved for ages 16+, we submitted a Freedom of Information Act Request to the FDA for all of the data within Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine biological product file. We have now sued the FDA for not releasing the data. Click below for court documents and for productions of Pfizer’s documents from the FDA.”
Human Rights vs Collectivism
In communist ideology, the mass violation of human rights is excusable, and arguably essential, to control and “protect” the remaining population. The people have no choice in the collectivist effort towards a central goal. In modern America, bureaucratic physicians create a state of iatrarchy, leading the direction of ‘accepted thought’ in our nation towards a socialist direction. Big Tech, working in harmony with the pharmaceutical agenda, has blocked alternative voices who speak against the medical takeover of our country. Frighteningly, it is difficult to avoid seeing the correlation between a communist regime and the medical control of our country. Just because someone has pre-thought out other people’s actions, does not always mean those actions are in the best interest of those they are being applied to.
The truth is, current generations who have willingly participated in these experimental trials will receive no form of heroic compensation. Similar to the personal metadata freely provided online to Big Tech platforms, COVID-19 patients are simply donating their bodies to a greater data-pool, where they will be individually unrecognized. Should long-term problems arise from these injectable concoctions, those responsible will be legally except for at least 75 years.
IBM and the Nazi Regime
Historically, America has seen this similar deflection from IBM, who over half a century later was accused of crimes against humanity—developing the counting machines which were used in the Nazi concentration camps. On September 7th, 2021 IBM announced3 all employees must be fully vaccinated.
Publicly responding to the company’s involvement in the atrocities, the technology company avoided mentioning any connection with Thomas Watson, the previous IBM CEO responsible for the meetings with Hitler. These meetings, resulted in IBM’s decision to proceed with selling the Nazi’s American technology. Could the holocaust have happened without the help of American businesses like IBM? The company’s apology for their involvement in the creation of concentration camps:
“We are a technology company, we are not historians,” – IBM
In 2014, spokeswoman Carol Malkovich stated, “hundreds of U.S. companies”, including IBM “had started losing control of its business in Germany beginning with Hitler’s rise to power in 1933.” though few catered to the explicit needs of Adolf Hilter. During World War II, many U.S. brands took advantage of the opportunity to capitalize on the German population and Nazi supporters.
Hugo Boss created the Nazi’s uniforms, Coca-cola, who was unable to do business with the Nazi regime during the war, was commissioned by Hitler to create “Fanta” for the German troops. How these companies were able to deflect responsibility from their contributions against the American population, was by pointing their finger towards the past. As long as those involved are no longer living or in control of the companies, they will not be penalized. On a pharmaceutical level, this has ultimately resulted in a state of iatrarchy. Big Pharma has the power to capture an unlimited amount of data, experimenting with new mRNA technology, essentially doing whatever they want, without repercussion.
The Bureaucracy of American Iatrarchy
A once in a lifetime opportunity: using a pandemic to begin experimental injection trials without claiming responsibility for any mistakes which arise, is a data-dream which even the Nazi regime may not have imagined. While major pharmaceutical companies cannot be accurately compared to a Nazi regime, the concern of a corporation “getting away” with deceiving and dividing the population through propaganda, simply for an increase revenue, is a concern from the American populous worth voicing. History shows, when large organizations want to suppress the voices of all resistance, promoting their narrow-minded belief on humanity through mass propaganda, it should be the rights of the population to speak up. Oppression is not an American characteristic. While by design, many modern Americans have forgotten the struggle early American settlers endured to break free and gain independence from England.
Many are willing to comply with any form of control, in order to continue their previous lifestyle. Seeing this, the U.S. government shaped society following the pandemic, to divide the population, at any cost. Many mainstream news organizations, rather than hold the federal government responsible, we paid to push narratives obsessing on race, gender, and education. Anything which the population would disagree on. Following this, an attack began on the resistance of a potential medical dictatorship. To initiate this, propaganda was unleashed through major cities in America, leaving smaller states with a completely different perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic. This created further division. Now, it has become almost unthinkable to publicly announce that one declines to take the coronavirus vaccine. Not only that, but legislation has been set in place to make life difficult for anyone choosing to stand up to the tyrannical regime.
In conclusion, those willing to participate in the experimental vaccination trials deserve answers that show both the safety and efficacy of these vaccines, especially when these substances are mandated to U.S. citizens of all ages. To ‘trust the science’ seems to have taken on new meaning. Now the term includes a public display of compliance, showing that you are not a threat to the pharmacutical agenda. Americans have begun to see COVID-19 injections as a regular and vital aspect of society, believing it is in benefit for other people to participate. For the first time, private health information has become public news, turning major cities into an almost surreal ‘cult-like’ society. If this is the case, and people are putting their lives behind the science, shouldn’t the participants, of all people, be allowed to view the totality of the clinical trial information and medical data to the concoctions to which is willingly being injected? How American people respond to authoritative oppression very well may decide the ultimate federal course of direction for the future generations of our country. Will the demand for information from Americans be answered?